GIVE STUDENT-ATHLETES THEIR FAIR SHARE
By Dick Meister
First it was the highly exploited graduate students who, as teaching
assistants, conduct most classes in America's colleges and universities.
Then it was equally exploited medical students - the interns and
residents who do much of the work in the country's teaching hospitals.
Now come the basketball and football player -- so-called "student-athletes"
-- whose play brings hundreds of millions of dollars to their schools, but
who often don't get even an education in return. They also are talking union
-- and for very good reason. They are probably the most exploited of all.
Teaching assistants and medical students have been seeking -- and in
some cases have won -- improved pay and working conditions through unions
they have formed in affiliation with the Service Employees and other major
white-collar unions. But they also have turned to several blue-collar
unions, primarily the Auto Workers, that have expanded into white-collar
fields as their core of blue-collar workers has shrunk.
That's what at least one group of student-athlete organizers has done.
They've gotten financing and other support from the Steelworkers union in an
attempt to improve their status.
The initial demands of their Collegiate Athletes Coalition, made up of
former college players, call for:
Granting full health-care and life insurance benefits to student-athletes;
cutting back the mandatory practices and workouts that take up most of their
day; increasing the meager stipends paid them during playing seasons and
easing the restrictions on how much they can earn from outside jobs in their
off-seasons.
"We have year-round workouts and we risk -- and sustain -- injuries in
behalf of our institutions. In football we even risk our lives, not to
mention bringing in huge amounts of money to our institutions," notes the
coalition's chief organizer, Ramogi Huma. He's a graduate student at the
University of California at Los Angeles who was a starter on the football
team there until sustaining a career-ending injury.
Huma's group wants above all to make guaranteeing athletes a true
education the top priority of the National Collegiate Athletic Association
(NCAA) that governs college sports.
Less than half of student-athletes graduate -- as few as 10 percent at
some major schools -- and only about 1 percent make it into professional
sports.
It's frequently said, however, that while in college student-athletes
get a lucrative "free ride." Well, here's what most of them actually get:
scholarships covering tuition, room and board and maybe a few other expenses
plus, in some cases, a little under-the-table money from team boosters. The
few superstars destined for high-paying professional careers also may get
illicit payments from sports agents who want to represent them when they
turn pro.
Whatever the athletes get, it's only a tiny fraction of what their play
brings the colleges and universities that recruit them strictly to help
their teams win games and thus increase school income. Schools with winning
teams get the big bucks, most notably by selling television rights to
broadcasters who use their athletes in what is mainly an attempt to peddle
fast-food, beer, sneakers and anything else that might bring a profit.
Coaches also do very well. Those at major institutions can make annual
salaries in the high six figures and get almost as much in addition by
endorsing products, outfitting their players in particular brands of
footgear and engaging in other less-than-ethical commercial ventures denied
their supposedly amateur players.
There are exceptions, but at most of the schools, the athletes are fortunate
if they even attend many classes, given their heavy practice, game and
travel schedules.
"You're not a student-athlete but an athlete-student," notes Isiah Thomas,
who left the University of Indiana to star in professional basketball for
the Detroit Pistons. "Your main purpose is ... to be a ballplayer, to
generate some money, put people in the stands. Eight or ten hours of your
day are filled with basketball, football."
Most of the grossly undercompensated athletes are simply being cheated
out of an education. It's common at many major institutions for athletes to
retain their eligibility to play by being credited for course work they
didn't do, tests they didn't take and papers someone in the athletic
department wrote for them, or by being given higher grades than they
actually earned. Some spend what little classroom time they do have
studying such weighty matters as the theory of basketball or football.
Once their athletic eligibility is used up, no more such favors are granted,
they lose their scholarships, and out into the cruel world they're tossed,
often with no employable skills.
Some would-be reformers argue that the only way to clean up the corrupt mess
that big-time college athletics has become would be to embrace pure
amateurism. No scholarships, no players who weren't legitimate full-time
students, absolutely no special treatment for the athletes or their coaches,
no TV deals. It would be sport for the joy of sport, not sport as
highly profitable commercial entertainment.
Nice idea, but forget it. Highly influential colleges and universities,
their alumni and coaches, TV broadcasters, advertisers and the other
powerful forces who profit so heavily from the status quo would never allow
it. Nor would most of the fans whose money fuels the system.
But granting a fair share of the loot to the players who are essential to
the making of big profits should be a quite possible reform.
Even a former executive director of the NCAA, Walter Byers, says
"dramatic changes are necessary to permit athletes to participate in the
enormous proceeds."
Maybe help could come from the National Basketball Association and
National Football League, which use colleges as training grounds for their
future players without charge.
Or maybe, as some have suggested, colleges themselves should turn pro,
assembling squads of openly paid non-students to represent them in
collegiate minor leagues. The players would be encouraged -- or required --
to use the money to get a college education in the off-season or when they
quit playing.
Others suggest colleges could pay current players, but put the money in
trust funds of, say, $30,000 to $50,000 a year that they could collect only
if, and when, they graduated.
No significant reforms will be accomplished, however, until student-athletes
join in effective solidarity. Like teaching assistants, medical students
and many other exploited groups inside and outside academia, their only real
hopes lie in forming strong unions.
Dick Meister is a freelance columnist in San Francisco who has covered labor
and educational issues for four decades as a reporter, editor and
commentator. Copyright c 2001 Dick Meister.
|
|