LABOR'S DAY IS FOR EVERYONE
By Dick Meister
Labor Day. Time once more for politicians and union adherents to speak
of the greatness of organized labor. Time once more for others to
ignore the speechmakers, as they mark the end of summer with yet another
three-day weekend.
The general public indifference is understandable. After all, less than
15 percent of the country's working people are in unions these days. But
even if they are not union members -- even if they do not approve of
unions -- they should consider this while enjoying the long Labor Day
holiday:
There wouldn't be any three-day weekends if it wasn't for those unions.
None.
If unions hadn't done what they did -- and continue to do -- it's
highly unlikely that anyone outside the executive ranks would be getting a
paid holiday on Labor Day, or on any other day. (Or even, of course, that
there would be such a holiday as Labor Day.)
Nor is it likely that those who are required to work on such holidays
would be getting the pay of two to three times their regular rate that
unions have made the standard for holiday work in most areas -- or get
premium pay for any other work, at any other time.
Holidays meant very little to most working people in the days before
unions became effective. They meant only an unwelcome day off and loss of a
day's pay or, at best, a day of work at regular wages.
Those were the days when unions still were struggling primarily for
nothing more than legal recognition. It wasn't until World War II that
unions were able to go beyond the fundamentals and make negotiation of paid
holidays a common practice, a concession employers made in lieu of the pay
raises federal wage controls prohibited during the war.
The paid vacations so many working people took as usual this summer
also were very rare until unions demanded and won them. So were
employer-financed pensions and medical care and other fringe benefits,
health and safety standards, job security and other things now commonly
granted most workers, union and non-union alike.
Thus without unions, there would be no paid holidays for most people, no
premium or overtime pay, no paid vacations, few fringe benefits and little
protection against job-related hazards and arbitrary dismissal.
Without unions, as a matter of fact, the standard work day might very well
still be 10 to 12 hours, the standard work week six to seven days, and
working people would have few of the rights so many now take for granted.
That includes the overriding right of having a genuine voice in determining
their pay and working conditions.
You doubt it? Consider the remembrances of Mark Hawkins, who worked in
the warehouses along San Francisco's busy waterfront in the 1930s, before
the coming of effective unionization.
Hawkins remembered men wrestling with crates, bundles, cartons, merchandise
in all sizes, shapes and weights, 10 hours a day, often every day of the
week, for a mere $60 a month. They worked as many hours on as many days as
the boss demanded, at whatever pay he offered, lest they be replaced by
others clamoring for jobs in those dark days of the Great Depression.
Hawkins especially remembered a fellow worker who failed to raise his hand
one Saturday when the boss made his usual Saturday afternoon request for
"volunteers" to work Sunday. The reluctant warehouseman pleaded that his
wife, undergoing a complicated pregnancy, was seriously ill and would need
him at home to comfort her.
"Okay," said the boss -- "but don't you think she'll feel even worse if
you have to tell her you don't have a job anymore?"
The man worked that Sunday. When he got home, his wife was dead.
Very few of today's employers would even consider acting in such a
manner. It would be virtually unthinkable, given the firm standing gained
for all workers by the country's now solidly entrenched unions. That alone
is more than enough reason to honor organized labor on the holiday it won
for everyone.
Copyright Dick Meister, a freelance columnist in San Francisco who has
covered labor issues for four decades as a reporter, editor and commentator.
|
|